Уровень 0 · материалов: 6
В кластер входят документы, описывающие применение российского законодательства для блокировки сайтов и преследования пользователей за распространение информации в интернете.
Общие признаки: блокировка веб-ресурсов, законы о противодействии экстремизму, цензура информации, ограничение свободы слова в сети
Группа выше: Интернет-цензура в России как явление
Смысл: The main idea is the censorship and closure of a veteran Russian website by state security services over the quoting of extremist materials, illustrating the legal mechanisms and ironies of Russian anti-extremism laws.
The Russian FSB shut down Leonid Kaganov's website because he quoted an antisemitic poem, leading him to migrate his content to a German server.
Смысл: The main idea is that the Russian state is expanding its use of anti-extremism laws to criminalize the act of sharing information on Telegram, using the case of lawyer Dmitry Tretyakov to signal that even a brief expression of agreement with political content can lead to imprisonment.
A Russian lawyer faces up to five years in prison for reposting a journalist's protest guide on Telegram with the comment 'agree'.
Смысл: The text highlights the trend of Russian authorities using vaguely defined laws to censor open-access information platforms, specifically targeting wiki-based sites like 'Orlec' and Wikipedia in the Orel region.
The Orel prosecutor's office is attempting to block Wikipedia for local students due to an article on profanity, following a failed attempt to ban another wiki site for extremism.
Смысл: The text describes a legal case where a Russian citizen was charged with displaying Nazi symbols due to his forum avatar, illustrating the strict enforcement of anti-extremism laws in the digital space.
A user of the 'Forum of Kostroma Jedis' is facing administrative charges and potential fines or arrest because the Prosecutor's Office deemed his avatar as Nazi imagery.
Смысл: The main idea is that the Russian judicial system failed to protect digital rights by allowing government bodies to block an educational and transparency-focused website based on automated bot decisions without any legal evidence of wrongdoing, thereby legitimizing arbitrary censorship in schools.
A Moscow court ruled that the city's IT department can arbitrarily block websites in schools based on automated filters, even when the judge refuses to view the site due to a lack of internet access in the courtroom.
Смысл: The text informs the reader about the censorship of the Lurkmore wiki under Russian Law 149-FZ and critiques the practice of blocking entire domains instead of specific pages.
Lurkmore.to was blocked under Federal Law 149-FZ, sparking debate over the inefficiency of blocking entire domains instead of individual pages.