Уровень 0 · материалов: 4
Сюда входят документы, описывающие проблему случайной блокировки незаблокированных ресурсов из-за совместного использования IP-адреса с запрещенным контентом.
Общие признаки: блокировка по IP, сопутствующий ущерб, случайная цензура, неэффективность интернет-фильтрации
Группа выше: Технические недостатки блокировок и сопутствующий ущерб
Смысл: The main idea is that indiscriminate IP-based blocking by ISPs (specifically Beeline) leads to 'collateral damage' where harmless websites are censored because they share an IP address with a banned site.
A gaming website was accidentally blocked by Beeline because it shared an IP address with a court-ordered extremist site.
Смысл: The main idea is the critical danger and inefficiency of blocking entire IP addresses in national censorship registries, which leads to unintentional outages of essential global digital services.
A Google IP was mistakenly or intentionally added to Russia's banned sites registry, disrupting multiple services like Gmail and Google Drive until community pressure led to its removal.
Смысл: The text describes the accidental blocking of a BlackBerry developer blog due to its hosting on WordPress.com, illustrating the collateral damage caused by IP-based internet censorship.
A BlackBerry developer blog was inadvertently blocked in Russia because it shared IP addresses with WordPress.com.
Смысл: The main idea is that the author is blocking a specific IP range belonging to the Russian Electronic Government because it is conducting unwanted attacks or improperly crawling their servers while ignoring standard web protocols.
The author blocks a Rostelecom subnet associated with the Russian Electronic Government after experiencing network attacks and robots.txt violations.