Уровень 0 · материалов: 9
В кластер входят документы, описывающие технические риски и недостатки систем дистанционного электронного голосования на выборах в России, и не входят документы о других системах голосования, таких как платформы для общественных инициатив.
Общие признаки: уязвимости систем ДЭГ, отсутствие прозрачности и верификации, манипуляции с результатами выборов, критика использования блокчейна, нарушение анонимности голосования
Группа выше: Электронное голосование и выборы
Смысл: The main idea is that the technical architecture of the Russian federal electronic voting system is intentionally or negligently opaque, allowing for undetectable manipulation of election results by the system operator.
An investigation into DEG voting discrepancies reveals an architecture where votes are detached from voters, making undetected electoral fraud technically possible.
Смысл: The main idea is that the Moscow electronic voting system is designed in a way that precludes independent auditing and enables potential fraud through hidden candidate IDs and the absence of public source code.
Technical analysis reveals that Moscow's 2022 electronic voting system uses opaque candidate IDs and lacks public source code, making independent result verification impossible and enabling potential vote manipulation.
Смысл: The main idea is that Moscow's electronic voting system lacks transparency and verifiable integrity, as critical data needed to calculate final results (especially regarding re-voting) is hidden in a private blockchain, making official results impossible to independently validate.
Technical analysis reveals that Moscow's electronic voting results are unverifiable due to hidden data, missing public decryptions, and discrepancies between issued and received ballots.
Смысл: The text asserts that Russian remote electronic voting systems are designed with systemic flaws that allow authorities to track individual votes via side-channel data (like IP logs), thereby destroying voting secrecy and enabling political repression.
Russian electronic voting systems lack true anonymity because organizers can link voters to their choices using server logs, turning a tool for democracy into a mechanism for surveillance.
Смысл: The main idea is the exposure of the internal workings of Russian electronic voting machines, highlighting potential security vulnerabilities and risks to voter privacy.
Source code for Russian KOIB electronic voting machines was leaked via government procurement documents and published on GitHub for public security auditing.
Смысл: The main idea is that the electronic voting system used in Russia is a 'fake blockchain' because its centralized control by the state renders the inherent security of blockchain technology useless, effectively allowing for potential manipulation and loss of voter privacy.
Grigory Bakunov critiques Russia's electronic voting as a fraudulent implementation of blockchain technology that allows state control and lacks genuine transparency.
Смысл: The main idea is that the Russian federal DEG system uses advanced cryptographic methods, such as blind signatures and homomorphic encryption, to technically ensure voter anonymity and ballot secrecy, making it theoretically more resistant to identity-linked tracking than simpler electronic systems.
An analysis of the Russian federal electronic voting system's use of blind signatures and homomorphic encryption to ensure ballot secrecy and prevent voter identification.
Смысл: The main idea is that the Russian DEG system uses 'blockchain' as a superficial label to mask a centralized, opaque system that fails to provide the core guarantees of secure elections: anonymity and verifiable transparency.
The author argues that Russia's electronic voting system is a centralized database masquerading as a blockchain to mislead the public while remaining prone to manipulation.
Смысл: The main idea is that electronic voting systems are fundamentally flawed and dangerous because they replace independent, physical verification with a requirement for absolute trust in a centralized technical authority, making systemic fraud easier to execute and harder to prove.
Electronic voting is a regression from paper ballots because it removes the possibility of independent observation and requires blind trust in state-controlled technology.